Welcome | Richard's Religious Life | The Real Richard | Genealogies | The Players | Stage History | Links

The Religious Life of Richard III

The historical figure of Richard III continues to be controversial, but in recent years historians have attempted to approach Richard from new directions. A good example is The Religious Life of Richard III: Piety and Prayer in the North of England by Jonathan Hughes (Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing Limited, 1997). The following review will give readers a sense of the ongoing debates surrounding the last Yorkist king.

J.S. Hamilton
History Department
Baylor University


       Richard III is easily the most controversial figure in medieval English history. Viewed by some as the very embodiment of evil, Shakespeare's "wretched, bloody, and usurping boar," he is seen by others as an amoral but brilliant Machiavellian, while still other historians and laypeople labor to rehabilitate his image, tarnished, they would say, by false Tudor propaganda. Jonathan Hughes does not set out so much to rehabilitate Richard as to contextualize him. There is no attempt to deny his complicity in the deaths of the princes, for instance, but rather an attempt to understand the nature of Richard's motivation and justification for such an act. The subtitle of his study, Piety and Prayer in the North of England reveals the main thrust of the work, and as such this book builds upon Hughes' earlier Pastors and Visionaries: Religion and Secular Life in Late Medieval Yorkshire.

       Hughes begins by pointing a contrast between an old-fashioned chivalry rooted in honor and family, with a newer ideal of service to the state based on the writings of antiquity. Embraced by the court of Edward IV, this new outlook was embodied in works such as Anthony Woodville's edition of The Dicts and Sayings of the Philosophers (1477), the first printed book produced by Caxton's press at Westminster Abbey. Similarly, Hughes argues, there was a new religious outlook growing among the governing class in England in the late fifteenth century, an outlook that again drew much of its inspiration from the moral writings of ancient writers such as Cicero and Seneca. But Richard III did not apparently share either of these new ideals. Hughes paints a convincing portrait of Richard firmly rooted in the religious traditions of the northeast of England, of Richard Rolle and Nicholas Love, fostered by his mother Cecily Neville, her Yorkshire family, and their affinity.

       Perhaps the most controversial aspect of this book will be Hughes' examination of the private religious life of Richard III, a subject for which there is only limited evidence. One of the avowed purposes of the book is "to demonstrate that books of hours can be read with fresh enthusiasm and seen in less institutional, self-referential terms and used for their relevance to the lives of the nobility." (p. 26) In undertaking such a reading, Hughes is willing to go farther even than the editors of Richard III's book of hours, Anne F. Sutton and Livia Visser-Fuchs. Hughes stresses that this book was personal--it was purchased second-hand and contained only three illustrations. Moreover, it contained several unusual prayers and a litany composed for the king as well as a personal prayer invoking Christ's protection and deliverance from his enemies. Hughes presents a very personal reading of Old Testament history, and particularly King David, with whom Richard would presumably have identified. "The key to Richard's self-image is prayer, the way he communicated with himself and God" (pp. 107-8). This communication, Hughes argues, was introspectively pious, and reflected Richard's "fanatical conviction that he was God's chosen instrument..." (p. 108), a belief he maintained until the very end.

       If not entirely convincing--as so much of his argument is based on circumstantial evidence, comparative analyses, and outright speculation--Hughes at the very least provides a plausible reading of the religiosity of an enigmatic king. The Richard III who emerges from these pages is complex and often contradictory, but more compelling than ever as a result.

Copyrights held by authors of articles.
For permission to reproduce for teachers, contact McLennan Theatre Department at (254)299-8101

« back